Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04621
Original file (BC 2013 04621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04621

			COUNSEL:  NONE 

			HEARING DESIRED: NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code “2C,” (Approved Honorable Involuntary 
Separation or Entry Level Separation), on his DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed 
to a “1” to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force.  



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had a good, clean military record.  He just washed out of 
technical training school.  He was discharged with an honorable 
characterization of service.  He would like to reenlist in the 
Air Force and complete his term/dream.  

The applicant did not submit any additional documentation in 
support of his request.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to copies of documents extracted from the Automated 
Records Management System (ARMS), the applicant enlisted in the 
Regular Air Force on 18 September 2001, and was released from 
active duty on 17 April 2002, with an honorable characterization  
of service, a separation code of “JHJ” with a narrative reason 
for separation of “unsatisfactory performance,” and was credited 
with completing 7 months, of active duty service.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  DPSOA states the applicant does 
not provide proof of an error or injustice in reference to his 
RE Code.  On 15 April 2002, his commander directed that he be 
discharged with an honorable character of service.  The 
applicant cannot be awarded a RE code of “1J, eligible to 
reenlist, but elects separation,” because his commander 
recommended him for separation which is in line with being 
denied reenlistment by his commander under the Selective 
Reenlistment Program (SRP).  The RE Code “2C” is the correct 
code based on the applicant’s involuntary discharge with 
honorable character of service.  

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 7 March 2014, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  To date, a response has not been received. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.  

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.



The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 3 June 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

		, Panel Chair
		, Member
		, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04621 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149 dated 23 September 2013.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 December 2012.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 March 2014. 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05652

    Original file (BC 2013 05652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05652 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 1J. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant does not provide proof...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00300

    Original file (BC-2013-00300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02810

    Original file (BC 2013 02810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 19 May 2008. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, unless otherwise directed by the board. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03635

    Original file (BC 2013 03635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03635 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “2C,” (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation), on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 14 February 2012, he opted to consult counsel and submit a statement in his behalf. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01860

    Original file (BC-2013-01860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02372

    Original file (BC 2013 02372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 September 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSOA that the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. Exhibit E....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05034

    Original file (BC 2013 05034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSOA states the RE code “2C” is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized character of service and the applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05509

    Original file (BC 2013 05509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It also disqualified him from retention in the Air Force. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00302

    Original file (BC 2014 00302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2C (Involuntary separation with Honorable discharge) be corrected to allow him to reenlist in the military. In this respect, we note that while the applicant self-eliminated from training in the face of his inability to complete the rigorous physical requirements of pararescue...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05173

    Original file (BC 2013 05173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and corresponding separation code (JHJ) be changed to a medical reason. In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides medical documentation, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and other documentation. The...